
For well over 40 years, I’ve been deeply entrenched in and around franchising. I’ve been unapologetically pro-franchising throughout my career, while at the same time never hesitating to defend either side of the franchise relationship when I believe it deserves defending.
Over the decades, I’ve heard and witnessed more than my fair share of horror stories. Franchisors lacking proper systems. Franchisees claiming they were misled. Brands with weak training. Models that appeared difficult to operate. Locations that continually struggled. Markets blamed. Demographics blamed. Competition blamed. Rent blamed. Labor blamed. Inflation blamed. Corporate blamed.
And of course, the familiar refrain always surfaces:
“Franchisees need to do better due diligence.”
There’s truth in that. There always will be.
But there’s another side to this conversation that deserves equal attention.
What continues to amaze me, even after all these years, is watching an underperforming location change hands multiple times… only to suddenly become successful under a new franchisee.
I’ve seen locations turned over two or three times. Everyone involved questioned the site. The area. The market. The brand. The franchisor. The viability of the model itself.
Then a new franchisee comes in.
Within six months, revenue doubles.
Customer reviews improve dramatically.
Rewards memberships begin growing consistently.
Margins improve.
Team morale changes.
The energy changes.
The same location.
The same market.
The same brand.
The same franchisor.
So what changed?
The operator.
That’s not meant as criticism toward the former franchisees. Most were not bad people. Many worked hard. Some likely sacrificed everything financially and emotionally trying to make the business work.
And contrary to what many people immediately assume, the answer is not always capitalization either.
In several cases I’ve witnessed, the new franchisee was actually less capitalized than the previous operator. They inherited operational issues, damaged reputations, employee turnover, unhappy customers, and financial strain. They entered an uphill battle surrounded by skepticism.
Yet somehow… they succeeded.
And then something even more interesting happens.
That same franchisee goes on to take over another struggling location that had also failed multiple times.
Same story.
Same skepticism.
Same questions.
And once again, the results change dramatically.
So what changed?
Again… the operator.
And candidly, I know this firsthand because I was once that franchisee.
Years ago, I took over a terrible location and immediately turned it around.
Then I did it again at another location.
Same story. Same results.
Then another.
And another.
And yet another.
People started believing I had some kind of magic formula.
But eventually, I crashed and burned.
I lost everything.
Why?
That’s the hard question very few franchisees are willing to honestly ask themselves.
The answer was me.
Somewhere along the way, I changed.
I was no longer operating with the same intensity, commitment, urgency, and discipline that drove those early turnarounds.
The things I did relentlessly at the first locations, I slowly stopped doing at the others.
I became less immersed.
Less focused.
Less hands-on.
My goals changed.
My mindset changed.
And like many franchisees who struggle, I found plenty of things to blame.
The economy.
The market.
The labor pool.
The franchisor.
Competition.
Costs.
Location challenges.
Operational pressures.
After all, what franchisee ever wants to blame themselves?
But eventually, experience and maturity force you to confront uncomfortable truths.
Sometimes the greatest difference in success or failure is not the market, the model, the brand, or even the location.
Sometimes it’s the operator looking back at themselves in the mirror.
Because franchise brands are only as good as the people operating them.
Yes, franchising requires strong systems, support, training, leadership, and operational infrastructure. Without those things, even good franchisees can fail.
But even the strongest franchise system cannot compensate for a lack of commitment, urgency, resilience, accountability, adaptability, and relentless determination from the franchisee.
Some operators simply approach business differently.
They engage differently.
They lead differently.
They respond to adversity differently.
Some possess an overwhelming desire to succeed.
Others operate with something even stronger:
A need to succeed.
And there is a difference.
The franchisees who often create the greatest turnarounds are not necessarily the smartest, wealthiest, or most experienced. Frequently, they are the ones who become completely immersed in the business. They understand every customer interaction matters. Every review matters. Every labor hour matters. Every catering order matters. Every missed opportunity matters.
They do not wait for rescue.
They do not spend their energy assigning blame.
They focus on solutions.
They lead from the front.
They outwork problems.
And perhaps most importantly, they understand something many people fail to fully appreciate:
Business is business… but business is also personal.
Very personal.
Especially in franchising.
Because behind every location is a person, a family, a dream, a financial risk, a reputation, and often years of sacrifice.
This is precisely why I’ve always believed the franchise relationship deserves more balanced conversations. Not every struggling location is proof of a bad brand. Not every failed franchisee was “sold a dream.” Not every successful operator simply “got lucky.”
Sometimes the greatest difference is the person operating the business.
That reality may not always be comfortable to discuss, but after more than four decades in franchising, I can say with complete confidence:
People remain the greatest variable in business success.
Always have been.
Always will be.
If you are a franchisor, franchisee, restaurant operator, or entrepreneur facing operational challenges, franchise relationship concerns, performance issues, or questions about growth, scalability, or franchise viability, I welcome the opportunity to discuss them with you.
Sometimes the answers are operational.
Sometimes they are structural.
And sometimes… they are personal.









You must be logged in to post a comment.